Matthew 20.1-16
Does anyone know what the average wage for a Premier Division
footballer is?
It’s a great game isn’t it judging people on the basis of
their wage or salary? We often measure someone’s worth on what they earn don’t
we? Or, as in the case of the footballer, we might raise our eyebrows and make
some comment about the madness of a system that pays obscene amounts to some
people who seem to add little in real value to society in comparison to those
who do, such as nurses, the police, care-workers or prison officers who are
paid a pittance in comparison.
When we play that game, if we’re still in work, the essential
rule is to compare what we earn - or used to, if we’re retired – with what
someone gets who we perceive has less value to society than we do, particularly
if that person earns more than us but is less skilled, or educated, or
productive. “I work three times as hard for a third of the money!”
Oh yes, if you want to get people upset very quickly, all you
have to do is start talking about earnings, and of course, despite the
legislation we still don’t have equal pay do we?
And what about if we stop talking in a general sense and make
comparisons closer to home? How many times have you heard the lament of the
older man who thinks he lost out to someone inferior because of
anti-discrimination laws? (In our house we call that sense of entitlement
“black-lesbian-in-a-wheelchair syndrome” because it encompasses all the
disadvantaged groups in one persona.)
Well, the older man, in the parable’s terms is the man who started working at dawn or nine o’clock and those who anti-discrimination laws have sought to protect are the ones who started at three or five o’clock.
Money, salaries, equal pay for equal work,
anti-discrimination laws: these ideas cause all kinds of tensions within us and
it’s with this same sense of discomfort that we approach this parable of Jesus
for today.
Well, the older man, in the parable’s terms is the man who started working at dawn or nine o’clock and those who anti-discrimination laws have sought to protect are the ones who started at three or five o’clock.
In short, the story goes like this: there was this man who
was a landowner owner and his property included a vineyard and he needed
workers to harvest his grapes. He went to the village square at six o’clock in
the morning and hired workers who went out and worked all day for twelve hours
until six at night. But that wasn’t enough to get the work done, so some more workers
were hired at nine o’clock and they worked for nine hours. Then more were hired
at noon and worked for six hours; more at three o’clock who worked for three
hours; and yet more were taken on late in the afternoon and worked for one
hour. Well, that’s the market economy at
work so there’s nothing particularly odd about the story so far – until the
landowner decides to pay everyone the full daily rate. Well, surprise,
surprise, those who had worked the longest felt hard done by.
Well, we’ve all been there haven’t we? We put in the full
effort while someone who works with us is a known skiver but is paid on the
same rate. Where’s the justice in that?
What is the purpose of this story? The parables of Jesus are
always earthly stories with heavenly meanings. So what is the heavenly meaning
of this earthly story for us today?
This is a parable about faith, I think: it’s about people who
come to faith in Christ at different times in their lives and who receive the
same reward because that’s the deal. The workers who came later weren’t skivers
and that’s where the modern comparisons break down. There’s nothing in the
story to suggest that they somehow worked with less enthusiasm or commitment.
In John’s Gospel Jesus said, “I came that you shall have life
in all its fullness.” What he didn’t say was, “You can only have that fullness
of life if you are a cradle Christian. Those of you who came to faith later in
life? Well, that’s a shame, because you only get a proportion of what I offer
depending on how late you came to faith.” Remember the thief on the cross? You
don’t come to faith much later than that, but the promised reward was there for
him too.
The deeper meaning of this parable should be clear to us: God
is inviting people to be in a relationship with him and he comes looking for
us. We’re the people in the market place. In the parable the landowner not only
seeks workers, but does so repeatedly until the end of the day, picking up
those who were there at the crack of dawn and those who came later. This
parable encourages us to see God in the same way, as the one who seeks
perpetually with his offer of abundant life made through Jesus.
What we seem to struggle with in the parable, to have the
most difficulty accepting, is the landowner’s extravagant generosity. What we
often fail to see is that all God’s gifts to us – his generosity and his grace
- are undeserved. St. Paul told the Christians at Ephasus this very thing, “For
by grace you have been saved …. Not through your own good works, in case any of
you should boast.”
When Jesus says, “I have come that you may have life in its
fullness” there’s an implied contract there and there was a contract in the
parable too: while some people got more than they expected, no one got less. No
one got ripped off.
Matthew must have made his point well because we seem to have
internalised the moral: we tend not – at least not that I’ve ever noticed – to
bemoan the fact that those who come to faith later get the same benefits as
those who came earlier but it must have been as issue for Matthew’s community. Jewish
converts to Christianity could claim that they had been God’s children all
along. There were obviously new converts who had come later and were equally welcomed
under God’s grace. There must have been some chuntering about that or this
parable would not have been included in Matthew’s Gospel. But we seem to have
learnt from it.
So, although the parable doesn’t say so explicitly, it would
be right to see this as an ongoing story: the landowner will be back the next
day and the day after looking for more workers to bring under his patronage
because that is the nature of God.
So, where does that leave us? We’re all here today because at
some stage we have come under the patronage of the landowner: God sought us out
and we signed up, so to speak. For some of us, that’s been a lifelong process
and we’ve grown into that faith: we can’t remember a time when we didn’t have
that faith in God. Others of us came to the same faith in a variety of different
ways and there may have been a point in time when we can date the moment our
faith began.
But how did it happen? These things don’t happen in a vacuum:
there were triggers along the way; something we read, something someone said to
us that lodged in our minds. There may well have been many of these triggers
over time which didn’t come to fruition all at once but which built up over
time until it all fell into place. We rightly recognise this to be the work of
the Holy Spirit but the Holy Spirit, while she works in the lives of people does
that through other people. That’s us: we are the triggers for others. We talk
to people, invite them to things, lend them books, whatever and the Holy Spirit
does the rest.
To use the language of the parable, we may have been taken on
at dawn or at nine o’clock or at midday but there are others still waiting to
be brought to the market place so that the landowner can find them waiting for
him.
“I came that you may have life in all its fullness.” Isn’t
that something we should want to share?